This week I’ll have to go with Philip’s presentation on Persistent Homology via Quivers. In addition to what Sazdanovic has gone over I read about persistent homology a bit for my project. Using Dynkin quiver representation to find barcodes rather than first using Vietoris-Rips complexes is pretty radical. It also uses crazy math like representation theory/category theory. While I know very little about either topic it is exciting hearing how it relates to stuff I know about like persistent homology.
April 22, 2018
Takeaway from week 2
1 Comment
jhmuelle
Author
Posts by jhmuelle
Comments by jhmuelle
-
Presentations Week 3
I agree with some bias that the presentations on TDA ...
-
The best of the third week
Andres' was a lot of fun. He did good job ...
-
FP Week 3
By the way I wrote my code in python and ...
-
Week 2 Presentations
Diagrams in particular were very helpful. It was a fairly ...
-
FP Week 2
Ben's was presentation great. It is cool to see an ...
gbarkle
April 22, 2018 — 22:53
I thought Philipp’s presentation was interesting as well. His topic describes a cool connection between persistence homologies discussed in class and representations on quivers through barcodes. I am curious to see how this is used in data analysis.